Symposium 4: Should the Use of Different Research Models for Networked Learning Lead to Different Results?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54337/nlc.v4.9617Keywords:
Grounded Theory, Activity Theory, Research Methodology, Networked LearningAbstract
This paper investigates the relationship between two theoretical models of research (Grounded Theory and Activity Theory), research design and research outcomes. Taking a previous study of networked learning using Ground Theory as a reference point, these issues are considered in two stages, firstly we consider the differences that should result if the theoretical views are followed systematically and secondly, the particular tools and processes that should be used. The differences discussed suggest that the theoretical basis for a methodology should, and does, have an effect on the research outcomes. If we are to progress in networked learning researchers should, at the very least, understand how different models ought to be applied and apply them consistently.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2004 Graham Alsop, Chris Tompsett
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
CC BY-NC-ND
This license enables reusers to copy and distribute the material in any medium or format in unadapted form only, for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. CC BY-NC-ND includes the following elements:
BY: credit must be given to the creator.
NC: Only noncommercial uses of the work are permitted.
ND: No derivatives or adaptations of the work are permitted.