Interconnected Agencies For Sustainable Futures
pdf

How to Cite

Fricker, P., Landau-Donnelly, F., Miltiadis, C., & Singh, S. (2023). Interconnected Agencies For Sustainable Futures: A Discourse on the Notion of Adaptation and Space. Journal of Problem Based Learning in Higher Education, 11(2), 100–125. https://doi.org/10.54337/ojs.jpblhe.v11i2.7780

Abstract

This article presents a nuanced discussion of four episodes on the complexity of possible trajectories for sustainable futures through diverse but intersecting practices and discourses as heterogeneous but complementary articulations of ‘adaptation and space.’

As design and creative processes evolve, new tools and methods, often adopted from science and technology, are integrated into art, design, and architecture. However, knowledge flow in these developments tends to be unidirectional, with science and technology influencing these fields more than vice versa. The diverse developments relating to the concept of ‘space’ have profound impacts on industries, urban habitats, design approaches, and the arts within the expanded field.

This article engages in a conversation from four different disciplinary perspectives, each articulating its own voice in relation to the broad notion of ‘adaptation and space.’ Through this multidisciplinary dialogue, presented in four episodes, it critically contributes to the ongoing discussion on sustainable futures, offering new trajectories for Problem-Based Learning (PBL) beyond disciplinary boundaries. In an era dominated by umbrella terminologies like sustainability, the field of higher education faces the challenge of integrating different expertise to foster new solutions for complex challenges. This article highlights the need for diverse fields such as architecture, art, and social science to engage in a dialogue about perception, interaction, and manipulation of space. Its purpose extends beyond the exploration of novel solutions, instead inviting multifarious perspectives that shape interconnected agencies for sustainable futures and their impact on education.

https://doi.org/10.54337/ojs.jpblhe.v11i2.7780
pdf

References

Alpaydin, E. (2016). Machine Learning: The New AI. MIT Press.

Butler, J. Butler, Gambetti, Z. Sabsay, Z. (eds 2016). Vulnerability in Resistance. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822373490

Chen, Y., Lin, Y., & Yang, J. (2020). Learning to Adapt: A Meta-Learning Approach for Few-Shot Learning. In Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), pp. 1746-1755.

Arendt, H. (2019). The Human Condition. University of Chicago Press.

Blesser, B., and Salter, L. (2009). The Other Half of the Soundscape: Aural Architecture. In The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. Mexico City.

Cantrell, B., & Mekies, L. (2018). Responsive Landscapes: Strategies for Responsive Technologies in Landscape Architecture. Routledge.

Castells, M. (1997). An Introduction to the Information Age. City. 2(7): 6–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604819708900050.

Christiansen, E. T., Kuure, L., Mørch, A. & Lindström, B. (2013). Problem-based learning for the 21st century: new practices and learning environments. Aalborg: Aalborg Universitetsforlag.

Deleuze, Gilles, and Felix Guattari. A Thousand Plateaus. Translated by Brian Massumi. 1987. Reprint, London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2013.

Edgerton, S. (1985). The Renaissance Development of the Scientific Illustration. In Science and the Arts in the Renaissance, edited by John William Shirley and F. David Hoeniger, 168–97. Plainsboro, NJ: Associated University Presses.

De Graff, E., & Cowdroy, R. (1997). Theory and practice of educational innovation through introduction of problem based learning in architecture. International Journal of engineering education, 13, 166-174.

Eliasson, O. (2014). The Future Is Curved. Architectural Design 84(5): 86–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.1813.

Fenton-Glynn, L. (2019). The Adaptation of Space: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding the Role of Space in Adaptation to Climate Change. Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol. 65, pp. 101325.

Fisher, A., & Margolis, J. (2002). Unlocking the clubhouse: The Carnegie Mellon experience. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 34(2), 79–83. https://doi.org/10.1145/543812.543836

Fischer, G., (2013). Supporting self-directed learning with cultures of participation in collaborative learning environments. In Christiansen, E. T., Kuure, L., Mørch, A., & Lindström, B. (Eds.). PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING FOR THE 21st CENTURY: New Practices and Learning Environments. (1 ed.) Aalborg Universitetsforlag.

Forrester, J. W. (1969). Urban Dynamics. MIT Press and Productivity Press.

Forrester, J. W. (1992). System dynamics and learner-centered-learning in kindergarten through 12th grade education. Y_1993-01SD&LearnerCentered.pdf (clexchange.org)

Fricker, P. (2016). Towards a New Design and Teaching Methodology for Large-Scale Landscape Design in the Era of Digital Overload. In M. Boştenaru Dan & C. Crăciun (Eds.), Space and Time Visualisation (pp. 63–75). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24942-1_4

Fricker, P. (2018). The Real Virtual or the Real Real: Entering Mixed Reality. Journal of Digital Landscape Architecture, 3, 414-421.Wichmann Verlag. https://doi.org/10.14627/537642044

Fricker, P. (2020). Computational Design Pedagogy for the Cognitive Age. In Werner, L., and Koering, D. (Eds.), Anthropologic: Architecture and Fabrication in the Cognitive Age - Proceedings of the 38th ECAADe Conference - Volume 1, TU Berlin, Berlin, Germany, 16-18 September 2020, Pp. 685-692. https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.ecaade.2020.1.685

Fricker, P. (2022). Computing with nature: Digital design methodologies across scales. In R. Monacella & B. Keane (Eds.), Designing Landscape Architectural Education: Studio Ecologies for Unpredictable Futures (1st. edition, p. 438). Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. https://www.routledge.com/Designing-Landscape-Architectural-Education-Studio-Ecologies-for-Unpredictable/Monacella-Keane/p/book/9780367703653

Fricker, P., & Kotnik, T. (2023a). Computing Land-Scapes. In Patterns of Interaction: Computational Design Across Scales (pp. 49–67). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9083-0_4

Fricker, P., & Kotnik, T. (2023b). Patterns of interaction: Computational design across scales. Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9083-0

Girot, C. (2016). The course of landscape architecture: A history of our designs on the natural world, from prehistory to the present. Thames & Hudson.

Harvey, D. (1989). The condition of postmodernity: An enquiry into the origins of cultural change. Blackwell.

Harvey, D. (2006). Space as a Keyword. In David Harvey, A Critical Reader, edited by Noel Castree and Derek Gregory, 70–93. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470773581.ch14.

Hermansdorfer, M., Borg, K., Fricker, P., & Skov-Petersen, H. (2020). Bridging Tangible and Virtual Realities: Computational Procedures for Data-Informed Participatory Processes. Journal of Digital Architecture, 5, 354-365. Wichmann Verlag. https://doi.org/10.14627/537690036

Illeris, K. (2003). Towards a contemporary and comprehensive theory of learning. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 22(4), 396-406. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370304837

Jensen, C. G. (2017). Collaboration and Dialogue in Virtual Reality. Journal of Problem Based Learning in Higher Education, Vol 5 No 1 (2017): Special issue: Blended Learning in Architecture and Design Education. https://doi.org/10.5278/ojs.jpblhe.v0i0.1542

Keyser, C. J. (1906). Mathematical Emancipations. The Passing of the Point and the Number Three: Dimensionality and Hyperspace. The Monist, 65–83. https://doi.org/10.5840/monist190616134

Korn, M., & Reißmann, W., & Röhl, T., & Sittler, D. (2019). Infrastructuring Publics. Springer.

Landau-Donnelly, F. (2021). Contentious Walls. CAP - Public Art Journal, 3(2), Article 2. https://journals.ap2.pt/index.php/CAP/article/view/509

Landau, F., Pohl, L., & Roskamm (Eds.). (2021). [Un]Grounding. Retrieved April 10, 2023, from https://www.transcript-verlag.de/978-3-8376-5073-0/un-grounding/

Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford University Press.

Law, J., & Urry, J. (2004). Enacting the social. Economy and Society, 33(3), 390-410. https://doi.org/10.1080/0308514042000225716

Longo, G. (2019). Mathematical Infinity “in Prospettiva” and Spaces of Possibilities. Arts et Sciences, 3 (1). https://doi.org/10.21494/ISTE.OP.2019.0415.

M’Closkey, K., & VanDerSys, K. (2017). Dynamic Patterns: Visualizing Landscapes in a Digital Age (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315681856

Marchart, O., (2012). Die politische Differenz. Suhrkamp

Meet to Sleep. (2016, April 5). Actipedia. https://actipedia.org/project/meet-sleep

Miltiadis, C. (2019). The Architectural Continuum: Choropoietic Media and Post-Physical-World Environments. In Architectonics of Game Spaces. The Spatial Logic of the Virtual and Its Meaning for the Real, edited by Andri Gerber and Ulrich Götz, 183–99. Bielefeld, Germany: Transcript. https://www.transcript-verlag.de/978-3-8376-4802-7/architectonics-of-game-spaces/.

Miltiadis, C., & Gerriet K. S. (2021). Beyond the Visual - A Research Curriculum for Explorations in Spatiotemporal Environments. Journal for Artistic Research, no. 24 (September). https://www.researchcatalogue.net/view/815001/815002.

Nakamura, T. (2018). Adaptive Design Strategies for Sustainable Architecture. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Sustainable Materials, Systems and Structures (SMSS), pp. 103-110.

Nunez, H. C., Jonasen, T. S.,Skov, M., & Ryberg, T. (2016). Deliverable 2.1: Data-driven PBL model. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/aa45/c5d1cd31453cf357c0a2aa56772edb3a314d.pdf

Phadke, S., Khan, S., & Ranade, S. (2011). Why loiter? Women and risk on Mumbai streets. Penguin Books.

Picon, A. (2015). Smart Cities: A Spatialised Intelligence. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119075615

Perec, G. (1959) (2008). Species of Spaces and Other Pieces. Edited by John Sturrock. London: Penguin Classics.

Riemann, B. (1854). On the Hypotheses Which Lie at the Bases of Geometry. Habilitation, Göttingen: University of Göttingen.

Savery, J.R, (2006): Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1002

Van den Akker, J., Gravemeijer, K., McKenney, S., & Nieveen, N. (Eds.).(2006). Introducing educational design research. In Educational design research, 1st edition, 3-7. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203088364

Wertheim, M. (2010). Lost in Space: The Spiritual Crisis of Newtonian Cosmology. In Seeing Further: 350 Years of the Royal Society and Scientific Endeavour, 42–59. Harper Collins Publ. UK.

Williams, S. (2020). Data Action: Using Data for Public Good. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/12261.001.0001

Yang, J., Fricker, P., & Jung, A. (2022). From Intuition to Reasoning: Analyzing Correlative Attributes of Walkability in Urban Environments with Machine Learning. Journal of Digital Landscape Architecture, 7, 71-81. Wichmann Verlag. https://doi.org/10.14627/537724008

Articles published in Journal of Problem Based Learning in Higher Education are following the license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY)
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY). Further information about Creative Commons