How to Cite
Abstract
The increasing complexity of society's sustainability issues requires new educational approaches that facilitate transversal skills and competencies suitable for the 21st century. Students must be equipped with discipline-specific expertise or technical skill; but also competencies to collaborate across disciplines in creating innovative solutions to complex problems. This paper explores whether a problem-based learning environment focusing on creativity facilitates transdisciplinary engagement and creative competencies and to what extent this manifests into transdisciplinary career paths and creative mindsets in a life-long learning perspective. An analysis of interviews with graduates from a transdisciplinary program, Creative Genius, at Aalborg University indicates that a pedagogical approach focusing on the embodiment of creative competencies helps prepare students to transition from student to professional and equip them to engage in transdisciplinary and complex problem-solving in industry and society. Based on the results, the paper proposes a model for creative transdisciplinary thinking and suggests a focus on creative self-efficacy as an essential learning outcome in transdisciplinary PBL environments.
References
Aalborg University (2015). PBL – Problem-based Learning. pbl-aalborg-model_uk.pdf (prod-aaudxp-cms-001-app.azurewebsites.net) Accessed 09.04.2023.
Aalborg University (2022). Knowledge for the World – AAU strategy 2022-2026. aau-strategy-2022-26.pdf (prod-aaudxp-cms-001-app.azurewebsites.net) Accessed 09.04.2023.
Babatope, A. A., Samuel, T. M., Ajewole, P. I., & Anyanwu, O. M. (2020). Competence-Driven Engineering Education: A Case for T-Shaped Engineers and Teachers. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(1), 32-38. http://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i1.20274
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman. https://doi.org/10.1891/0889-8391.13.2.158
Barile, S., & Saviano, M. (2013). Dynamic capabilities and T-shaped knowledge: A viable systems approach. Contributions to theoretical and practical advances in management. A viable systems approach (VSA), ARACNE Editrice Srl, Roma, 39-59.
Bertel, L. B., Askehave, I., Brohus, H., Geil, O., Kolmos, A., Ovesen, N., & Stoustrup, J. (2021). Digital Transformation at Aalborg University: Interdisciplinary Problem-and Project-Based Learning in a Post-Digital Age. Advances in Engineering Education, 9(3)
Bertel, L. B., Winther, M., Routhe, H. W., & Kolmos, A. (2022). Framing and facilitating complex problem-solving competencies in interdisciplinary megaprojects: An institutional strategy to educate for sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education (Print Edition), 23(5), 1173–1191. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-10-2020-0423
Birgili, B. (2015). Creative and critical thinking skills in problem-based learning environments. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, 2(2), 71–80. https://doi.org/10.18200/JGEDC.2015214253
Bierema, L. L. (2019). Enhancing employability through developing T‐shaped professionals. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2019(163), 67-81. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.20342
Boelt, A. M., Kolmos, A., & Bertel, L. B. (2021). Facilitating Reflection and Progression in PBL: A Content Analysis of Generic Competences in Formal PBL Curricula. Journal of Problem-Based Learning in Higher Education, 9(1), 131-149. https://doi.org/10.5278/ojs.jpblhe.v9i1.6354
Byrge, C., & Hansen, S. (2009). The creative platform: a didactic approach for unlimited application of knowledge in interdisciplinary and intercultural groups. European Journal of Engineering Education, 34(3), 235-250. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043790902902914
Byrge, C., & Hansen, S. (2014). Enhancing Creativity for Individuals, Groups, and Organizations. Frydenlund Academic, ISBN 978-87-7118-490-7.
Byrge, C., & Hansen, S. (2015). The creative platform: A handbook in creative processes for education and work life. Frydenlund Academic. ISBN 9788771185256.
Byrge, C., & Tang, C. (2015). Embodied creativity training: Effects on creative self-efficacy and creative production. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 16, pp. 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2015.01.002
Byrge, C. (2021). A Corporate Fitness Centre for Innovative Capabilities: New Insights on How Creativity Training Can Develop Creative Competences, Creative Confidence, and a Creative Team Culture. Journal of Creativity and Business Innovation, 7, 2021.
Christensen, L. J,, Hansen, S., (2015). Creative Platform Learning (CPL): En undervisningsmodel hvor elevernes kreativitet anvendes til at styrke fagligheden. Fonden for Entreprenørskab
Connor, A. M., Berthelsen, C., Karmokar, S., Kenobi, B., Marks, S., & Walker, C. (2014). An unexpected journey: Experiences of learning through exploration and experimentation. In DesignEd Asia Conference, Hong Kong. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.2688.0805
Crawley, E. F. (2018). Redesigning undergraduate engineering education at MIT – the New Engineering Education Transformation (NEET) initiative. 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--30923
De Bono, E. (1985). Six thinking hats: An essential approach to business management. Little, Brown, & Company.
De Bono, E. (1992). Serious creativity: Using the power of lateral thinking to create new ideas. Harper Business. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(92)90068-x
Demirkan, H., & Spohrer, J. (2015). T-shaped innovators: Identifying the right talent to support service innovation. Research-Technology Management, 58(5), 12-15. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--3092310.5437/08956308X5805007
Edmondson, A. C. (2019). The fearless organization – Creating Psychological Safety in the Workplace for Learning, Innovation and Growth. Harvard Business School. https://doi.org/10.1108/tlo-04-2021-266
Euro-CASE (2020) 'Euro-CASE Engineering Education Platform - Discourses on the Future of Engineering Education in Europe. https://www.euro-case.org/platforms/platform-engineering-education/ Accessed 21.06.2023
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2004). The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind's Hidden Complexities. Basic Books. https://doi.org/10.1086/378014
Gallagher, S. A. (2015). The role of problem-based learning in developing creative expertise. Asia pacific education review, 16(2), 225–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-015-9367-8
Gombrich, C. (2018). Implementing Interdisciplinary Curricula: Some Philosophical and Practical Remarks. European Review, 26(S2), pp. 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1062798718000315
Guerra, A. (2017). Integration of sustainability in engineering education: Why is PBL an answer? International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 18(3):436–454. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-02-2016-0022
Guest, D. (1991). The hunt is on for the Renaissance Man of computing. The Independent, 17(9).
Hansen, S., & Byrge, C. (2009). The Creative Platform: a new paradigm for teaching creativity. Problems of Education in the 21st century, 18, 33-50.
Hänninen, L. I., Byrge, C., Gomez, P. N., Tang, C., Brøndum, K., Dingli, S. M., & Xerxen, S. P. (2020). Testing the effects of digital gamified creativity training. Journal of Creativity and Business Innovation, 6(2020), 5-17.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational psychology review, 16/2004, 235-266. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:edpr.0000034022.16470.f3
Kamp, A. (2016). Engineering education in the rapidly changing world: Rethinking the vision for higher engineering education (2nd ed.). TU Delft, Faculty of Aerospace Engineering. https://doi.org/10.59490/mg.71
Kelley, T., & Kelley, D. (2012). Reclaim your creative confidence: How to get over the fears that block your best ideas. Harvard Business Review. 90(12):115-135
Khan, M. Adil (2021). Changing Mindsets to Realize Agenda 2030: The Critical Role of Socially Conscious Leadership. Changing Mindsets to Realize the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Edited by UN DESA/DPIDG. New York, NY United States: United Nations (UNPAN). 37-47.
Klein, J. T. (2004). Prospects for transdisciplinarity. Futures, 36(4), 515–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2003.10.007
Kolmos, A., Bertel, L. B., Holgaard, J. E., & Routhe, H. W. (2020). Project Types and Complex Problem-Solving Competencies: Towards a Conceptual Framework. Educate for the future: PBL, Sustainability and Digitalisation 2020 56-65. Aalborg Universitetsforlag. International Research Symposium on PBL.
Kolmos, A., & De Graaff, E. (2014). Problem-based and project-based learning in engineering education: Merging models. In Cambridge Handbook of engineering education research. 141-161. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139013451.012
Kristiansen, K. B., Byrge, C. & Hansen, S., (2018). Business Model Creativity: A Horizontal Insight Model. Journal of Business Models. 6(2). https://doi.org/10.5278/OJS.JBM.V6I2.2454
London Interdisciplinary School (LIS) (2023). https://www.lis.ac.uk/ Accessed 08.04.2023.
Nicolescu, B. (2010). Methodology of transdisciplinarity: Levels of reality, the logic of the included middle, and complexity. Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering & Science, 1(1), 17-32. https://doi.org/10.22545/2010/0009
Ninan, J., Hertogh, M., & Liu, Y. (2022). Educating engineers of the future: T-shaped professionals for managing infrastructure projects. Project Leadership and Society, 3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plas.2022.100071
Oskam, I. F., (2009). T-shaped engineers for interdisciplinary innovation: an attractive perspective for young people as well as a must for innovative organizations, 37th Annual Conference – Attracting students in Engineering, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Otte, P. P. (2016). Integrating sustainable development in higher education through experience-based learning: Insights from experts in team (EiT) for developing a combined theoretical framework. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 10(1), 131–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973408215625550
Rimanoczy, I. (2020). The sustainability mindset principles: A guide to developing a mindset for a better world. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003095637
Runco, M. A., & Chand, I. (1995). Cognition and creativity, Educational Psychology Review, 7, 243–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02213373
Scharmer, O. C., (2016). Theory U, Leading from the future as it emerges, The social technology of presencing, Berett-Koehler Publisher, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090591111120430
Sternberg, R. J. and Lubart, T. I. (1996). "Investing in creativity." American Psychologist 51(7), 677-688. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.51.7.677
Strachan, S. M., Marshall, S., Murray, P., Coyle, E. J., & Sonnenberg-Klein, J. (2019). Using Vertically Integrated Projects to embed research-based education for sustainable development in undergraduate curricula. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 20(8), https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-10-2018-0198
Testimonials 2013-2018, The Creative Genius Program, Aalborg University (AAU) (2023). https://www.uva.aau.dk/digitalAssets/1296/1296212_testamonials-creative-genius-graduates-1-.pdf Accessed 13.06.2023.
Trujillo, G., & Tanner, K. D. (2014). Considering the role of affect in learning: Monitoring students' self-efficacy, sense of belonging, and science identity. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 13(1), 6-15. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-12-0241
UNESCO. Engineering for Sustainable Development: Delivering on the Sustainable Development Goals; UNESCO: Paris, France, 2021
Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace and Company.
Webb-Williams, J. (2018). Science self-efficacy in the primary classroom: Using mixed methods to investigate sources of self-efficacy. Research in Science Education, 48(5), 939–961. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9592-0
World Economic Forum (2023). The Future of Jobs Report 2023. https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-future-ofjobs-report-2023/ Accessed 18/6 2023.
Articles published in Journal of Problem Based Learning in Higher Education are following the license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY)
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY). Further information about Creative Commons