Introducing a Problem Analysis Tool Implies Increasement in Understanding the Problem Analysis Among Students
pdf

How to Cite

Bender, C., Lebech Cichosz, S., Kjærsdam Telléus, P., & Hejlesen, O. K. (2023). Introducing a Problem Analysis Tool Implies Increasement in Understanding the Problem Analysis Among Students: a PBL Case. Journal of Problem Based Learning in Higher Education, 11(3), 74–89. https://doi.org/10.54337/ojs.jpblhe.v11i3.7792

Abstract

Problem-based learning (PBL) is the through-going didactics at Aalborg University, but literature shows how integrating PBL into project work is challenging for students. Studies indicate that students especially struggle with the problem analysis section, i.e., what it consists of, how the structure of the analysis should be, etc. Moreover, literature shows that ignorance among students leads to conflicts among group members. The aim of the study was to evaluate the consequences of introducing a problem analysis tool to master students working with a PBL project.

Data analysis showed an increase (with significant p values) in the following 5 topics: 1) the problem analysis term, 2) problem analysis structure, 3) scientific argumentation, 4) learn to analyze instead of explaining, and 5) using literature to argue for a scientific problem.

Significant results showed that students believed that they had increased their understanding of the term problem analysis after being introduced to the problem analysis tool.

 

https://doi.org/10.54337/ojs.jpblhe.v11i3.7792
pdf

References

Amirikhorheh, S., Karimbux, N. Y., & Sc, M. M. (2014). Problem-Based learning in dental literature. Journal of Dental Education, 78(1), 98–109. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.0022-0337.2014.78.1.tb05661.x

Azer, S. A., & Azer, D. (2015). Group interaction in problem-based learning tutorials: a systematic review. European Journal of Dental Education: Official Journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe, 19(4), 194–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.12121

Barge, S. (2010). Principles of problem and project based learning - the Aalborg PBL model. Aalborg University, 24.

Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25(24), 3186–3191. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014

Bollela, V. R., Gabarra, M. H. C., da Costa, C., & Lima, R. C. P. (2009). Students and tutors’ social representations of assessment in problem-based learning tutorials supporting change. BMC Medical Education, 9, 30. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-9-30

Chen, J., Kolmos, A., & Du, X. (2021). Forms of implementation and challenges of PBL in engineering education: a review of literature. European Journal of Engineering Education, 46(1), 90–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2020.1718615

Demirel, M., & Dağyar, M. (2016). Effects of problem-based learning on attitude: a meta-analysis study. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(8), 2115–2137. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1293a

Dolmans, D. H. J. M. (2019). How theory and design-based research can mature PBL practice and research. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 24(5), 879–891. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-019-09940-2

Eun, B. (2019). The zone of proximal development as an overarching concept: A framework for synthesizing Vygotsky’s theories. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 51(1), 18–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2017.1421941

Hasslacher, B., Kapral, R., & Lawniczak, A. (2009). A problem based learning meta analysis : differences across problem types, implementation types, disciplines, and assessment levels andrew walker and heather leary. Learning, 3(1), 12–43. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12780009

Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3

Holgaard, J. E., Ryberg, T., Stegeager, N., Stentoft, D., & Thomassen, A. O. (2021) An introduction to problem-based learning in higher education. (1. edition). (pp. 1-18). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-8177-3.ch001. ISBN: 9788759338957

Holgaard, J. E., Ryberg, T., Stegeager, N., Stentoft, D., & Thomassen, A. O. (2020). PBL : Problembaseret læring og projektarbejde ved de videregående uddannelser. (2. udgave.). Samfundslitteratur. ISBN: 9788759337035

Kneupper, C. W. (1978). Teaching argument: an introduction to the toulmin model. College Composition and Communication, 29, 237–241.

Kolmos, A., Du, X., Holgaard, J. E., & Jensen, L. P. (2008). Facilitation in a PBL environment (Learning Chair in Problem Based (ed.); UCPBL UNES). http://vbn.aau.dk/files/16177510/facilitation_in_a_pbl_environment.pdf

Nielsen, J. A. (2013). Dialectical features of students’ argumentation: a critical review of argumentation studies in science education. Research in Science Education, 43(1), 371–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9266-x

O Doherty, D., Mc Keague, H., Harney, S., Browne, G., & McGrath, D. (2018). What can we learn from problem-based learning tutors at a graduate entry medical school? a mixed method approach. BMC Medical Education, 18(1), 96. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1214-2

Savin-baden, M. (2020). What are problem-based pedagogies? Journal of Problem Based Learning, 7(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.24313/jpbl.2020.00199

Stentoft, D. (2019). Problem-based projects in medical education: extending PBL practices and broadening learning perspectives. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 24(5), 959–969. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-019-09917-1

Sukackė, V., Guerra, A. O. P. de C., Ellinger, D., Carlos, V., Petronienė, S., Gaižiūnienė, L., Blanch, S., Marbà-Tallada, A., & Brose, A. (2022). Towards active evidence-based learning in engineering education: a systematic literature review of PBL, PjBL, and CBL. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/su142113955

Telléus, P. K., Bertel, L. B., Velmurugan, G., & Kofoed, L. B. (2023). Problems, complexity and interdisciplinarity. In PBL for a digital future (p. (in press)).

Thomassen, A. O., & Stentoft, D. (2020). Educating students for a complex future: why integrating a problem analysis in problem-based learning has something to offer. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.14434/ijpbl.v14i2.28804

Thorndahl, K. L., Velmurugan Giajenthiran, & Stentoft, D. (2018). The significance of problem analysis for critical thinking in problem-based project work. 7th International Research Symposium on PBL : Innovation, PBL and Competences in Engineering Education, 430–440. https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=eZ4nmJgAAAAJ&citation_for_view=eZ4nmJgAAAAJ:u5HHmVD_uO8C

Trullàs, J. C., Blay, C., Sarri, E., & Pujol, R. (2022). Effectiveness of problem-based learning methodology in undergraduate medical education: a scoping review. BMC Medical Education, 22(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03154-8

Velmurugan, G., Stentoft, D., & Davidsen, J. (2021). Disagreeing about the problem in PBL: how students negotiate disagreements regarding the problem in PBL. Journal of Problem Based Learning in Higher Education, 9(1), 42–62. https://doi.org/10.5278/ojs.jpblhe.v9i1.6241

Wass, R., & Golding, C. (2014). Sharpening a tool for teaching: the zone of proximal development. Teaching in Higher Education, 19(6), 671–684. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2014.901958

Wun, Y. T., Tse, E. Y. Y., Lam, T. P., & Lam, C. L. K. (2007). PBL curriculum improves medical students’ participation in small-group tutorials. Medical Teacher, 29(6), e198-203. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590701294349

Yew, E. H. J., & Goh, K. (2016). Problem-based learning: an overview of its process and impact on learning. In Health Professions Education, 2(2), 5–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpe.2016.01.004

Zakaria, M. I., Maat, S. M., & Khalid, F. (2019). A systematic review of problem based learning in education. Creative Education, 10(12), 2671–2688. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2019.1012194

Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students’ knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(1), 35–62. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10008

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2022 Clara Bender, Simon Lebech Cichosz, Patrik Kjærsdam Telléus, Ole Kristian Hejlesen