Keywords | Nøgleord
Citation/Eksport
Abstract | Abstract
Entrepreneurial ecosystems have gained attention for fostering innovation and sustainable transition. However, their complexity poses challenges, especially when different companies co-design for future making toward sustainable transition strategies implementation. Systemic Design (SD) offers potential solutions, employing system mapping tools like Gigamaps, that use visual synthesis to support effectively the participatory processes.
This article aims to present a formalized protocol for the use of Gigamaps as a co-design tool to trigger dialogues among industrial stakeholders, facilitating entrepreneurial ecosystem transition.
Through a case study from the master’s degree SD course at Politecnico di Torino, the article will present a Gigamaps-driven co-design experience in an entrepreneurial ecosystem.
Finally, the study limitation and the need for systems-thinking and complex science-based methods to support the implementation of those envisioned scenarios are stated.
Referencer
Acs, Zoltan J., Erik Stam, David B. Audretsch, and Allan O’Connor. 2017. “The lineages of the entrepreneurial ecosystem approach.” Small Business Economics 1 (49): 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9864-8
Adams, Richard, Sally Jeanrenaud, John Bessant, David Denyer, and Patrick Overy. 2015. “Sustainability-oriented innovation: a systematic review.” International Journal of Management Reviews 2 (18): 180-205. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12068
Alvedalen, Janna, and Ron Boschma. 2017. “A Critical Review of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems Research: Towards a Future Research Agenda.” European Planning Studies 25 (6): 887–903. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1299694
Battistoni, Chiara, Carolina Giraldo Nohra, and Silvia Barbero. 2019. “A Systemic Design Method to Approach Future Complex Scenarios and Research Towards Sustainability: A Holistic Diagnosis Tool.” Sustainability 11 (16): 4458. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11164458
Berglund, Henrik, and Vern L. Glaser. 2022. “The artefacts of entrepreneurial practice”. In Research Handbook on Entrepreneurship as Practice, edited by Neil Aaron Thompson, Orla Byrne, Anna Jenkins, Bruce T. Teague, 168-186. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Boaz, Annette, Stephen Hanney, Robert Borst, Alison O’Shea, and Maarten Olivier Kok. 2018. “How to engage stakeholders in research: design principles to support improvement.” Health Research Policy and Systems 1 (16). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-018-0337-6
Cohen, Boyd. 2005. “Sustainable Valley Entrepreneurial Ecosystems.” Business Strategy and the Environment 15 (1): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.428
Davidová, Marie, 2020. “Cocreative roles, agencies and relations in post-anthropocene: the real life gigamaps and full-scale prototypes of saap.” Strategic Design Research Journal 2 (13): 185-212. https://doi.org/10.4013/sdrj.2020.132.06
Dawkins, Cedric E. 2015. “Agonistic pluralism and stakeholder engagement.” Business Ethics Quarterly 1 (25): 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2015.2
DeLosRíos-White, Marta Irene, Peter Roebeling, Sandra Valente, and Ines Vaittinen. 2020. “Mapping the life cycle co-creation process of nature-based solutions for urban climate change adaptation.” Resources 4 (9): 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources9040039
Design Council UK. 2005. The design process. London: Design Council.
Frayling, Christopher. 1993. “Research in Art and Design.” In Royal College of Art Research Papers edited by Christopher Frayling, 1-5. London: Royal College of Art.
Friedman, Ken. 2008. “Research into, by and for design.” Journal of Visual Art Practice 7 (2): 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1386/jvap.7.2.153_1
Gonzalez-Porras, Lara, Anna Heikkinen, Johanna Kujala, and Riikka Tapaninaho. 2021. “Stakeholder engagement in sustainability transitions.” In Research Handbook of Sustainability Agency edited by Satu Teerikangas, Tiina Onkila, Katariina Koistinen, and Marileena Mäkelä, 214-229. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789906035.00021
Goodman, Jennifer, Angelina Korsunova, and Minna Halme. 2017. “Our collaborative future: activities and roles of stakeholders in sustainability-oriented innovation.” Business Strategy and the Environment 6 (26): 731-753. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1941
Guntveit, Malin, Marianne Kjørstad, and Birger Sevaldson. 2020. “Early validation of stakeholder needs by applying co-creation sessions.” INCOSE International Symposium 1 (30): 1398-1415. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2334-5837.2020.00793.x
Hakala, Henri, Steffen Farny, and Seppo Luoto. 2019. “Re-storying the Business, Innovation and Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Concepts: The Model-Narrative Review Method.” International Journal of Management Reviews 22 (1): 10-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12212
Irwin, Terry. 2018. “The emerging transition design approach.” In Design as a catalyst for change - DRS International Conference 2018, edited by Christiano Storni, Keelin Leahy, Muireann McMahon, Peter Lloyd, and Erik Bohemia. https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2018.210
Javanparast, Sara, Sally Robinson, Alison Kitson, and Joanne Arciuli. 2022. “Embedding research codesign knowledge and practice: learnings from researchers in a new research institute in Australia.” Research Involvement and Engagement 8 (71). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-022-00392-4
Jonas, Julia M., Julian Boha, David Sörhammar, and Kathrin M. Moeslein. 2018. “Stakeholder engagement in intra- and inter-organizational innovation.” Journal of Service Management 3 (29): 399-421. https://doi.org/10.1108/josm-09-2016-0239
Jones, Peter H. 2014. “Systemic Design Principles for Complex Social Systems”. In Social Systems and Design, edited by Gray Metcalf, 91-128. Tokyo: Springer.
Jones, Peter, and Jeremy Bowes. 2017. “Rendering Systems Visible for Design: Synthesis Maps as Constructivist Design Narratives.” She Ji 3 (3): 229–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2017.12.001
Kibler, Ewald, Bernadetta Aloina Ginting-Szczesny, Eero Vaara, and Jukka-Pekka Heikkilä. 2022. “Envisioning entrepreneurial engagement in North Korea.” Academy of Management Discoveries 3 (8): 459-489. https://doi.org/10.5465/amd.2020.0066
Kjørstad, Marianne, Kristin Falk and Gerrit Muller. 2021. “Exploring a co-creative problem solving toolbox in the context of norwegian high-tech industry.” Ieee Systems Journal 3 (15): 4046-4056. https://doi.org/10.1109/jsyst.2020.3020155
Köhler, Jonathan, Frank W. Geels, Florian Kern, Jochen Markard, Elsie Onsongo, Anna Wieczorek, Floortje Alkemade, Flor Avelino, et al. 2019. “An agenda for sustainability transitions research: state of the art and future directions.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 31: 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004
Micsinszki, Samantha, Nadia Tanel, Julia Kowal, Gillian King, Dolly Menna-Dack, Ángel Chú, and Michelle Phoenix. 2022. “Codesigning simulations and analyzing the process to ascertain principles of authentic and meaningful research engagement in childhood disability research.” Research Involvement and Engagement 1 (8). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-022-00398-y
Neves, Angela, Radu Godina, Susana G. Azevedo, and João C. Matias. 2020. “A Comprehensive Review of Industrial Symbiosis.” Journal of Cleaner Production 247: 119113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119113
Norman, Donald A., and Pieter Jan Stappers. 2015. “DesignX: Complex Sociotechnical Systems.” She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation 1(2): 83–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2016.01.002
Nousala, Susu, David Ing, and Peter Jones. 2018. “Systemic design agendas in education and design research.” Formakademisk - Forskningstidsskrift for Design Og Designdidaktikk 4 (11). https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.2608
O’Shea, Gregory, Steffen Farny, and Henri Hakala. 2019. “The buzz before business: a design science study of a sustainable entrepreneurial ecosystem.” Small Business Economics 3 (56): 1097-1120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00256-4
Petkovic, Jennifer, Alison Riddle, Elie A. Akl, Joanne Khabsa, Lyubov Lytvyn, Pearl Atwere, Pauline Campbell et al. 2020. “Protocol for the development of guidance for stakeholder engagement in health and healthcare guideline development and implementation.” Systematic Reviews 1 (9). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-1272-5
Raposo, Mário, Cristina Fernandes, and Pedro Mota Veiga. 2021. “We dreamed a dream that entrepreneurial ecosystems can promote sustainability.” Management of Environmental Quality an International Journal 1 (33): 86-102. https://doi.org/10.1108/meq-01-2021-0010
Ray, Kristin N., and Elizabeth Miller. 2017. “Strengthening stakeholder-engaged research and research on stakeholder engagement.” Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research 4 (6): 375-389. https://doi.org/10.2217/cer-2016-0096
Romani, Alessia, Francesca Casnati, and Alessandro Ianniello. 2022. “Codesign with more-than-humans: toward a meta co-design tool for human-non-human collaborations.” European Journal of Futures Research 10 (17). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40309-022-00205-7
Sanders, Elizabeth B.-N., and Pieter J. Stappers. 2008. “Co-Creation and the New Landscapes of Design.” CoDesign 4 (1): 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068.
Sevaldson, Birger. 2011. “GIGA-Mapping: Visualisation for Complexity and Systems Thinking in Design.” Nordic Design Research Conference. https://doi.org/10.21606/nordes.2011.015.
Spigel, Ben. 2017. “The relational organization of entrepreneurial ecosystems.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 1 (41): 49-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12167
Stewart, Susan. 2011. “Design thinking: understanding how designers think and work.” Design Studies 6 (32): 608-609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.07.009
Dette værk er under følgende licens Creative Commons Navngivelse – Ikke-kommerciel – Ingen Bearbejdede Værker (by-nc-nd).