Keywords | Nøgleord
Citation/Eksport
Abstract | Abstract
This article proposes a fundamental new understanding of videographic research as an embodied practice and of the video essay as a “mingled body”: Not only does the video essay fuse multiple film materials and diverging artistic and scientific methods into a new body of media. The video essay also engages the bodies of both its makers and viewers in new and unsettling ways. Via a theoretical discussion of the video essay’s body as well as via two concrete examples of embodied video essays the potentials of videographic research for a more vulnerable, non-normative academia of the future are outlined.
Referencer
Ahmed, Sara. 2006. Queer Phenomenology. Orientations, Objects, Others. Durham: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822388074
Álvarez López, Cristina, and Adrian Martin. 2016. “Tensions: On John Cassavetes’ ‘Gloria’ (1980).” Mubi Notebook Video (14 April 2016). https://mubi.com/en/notebook/posts/video-essay-tensions-on-john-cassavetes-gloria-1980
Bergala, Alain. 2015. La création cinéma. Crisnée: Yellow Now.
Binotto, Johannes. 2018. “Nicht zu identifizieren.” Filmbulletin 368 (January 2018): 18-19. https://doi.org/10.5169/seals-862999
Binotto, Johannes. 2021. “In Lag of Knowledge. The Video Essay as Parapraxis.” In Practical Aesthetics, edited by Bernd Herzognerath, 83-93. London: Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350116139.0011
Binotto, Johannes. 2021-2023. “Practices of Viewing.” transferences.org. https://transferences.org/videoessays/practices-of-viewing/
Bird, Katie. 2023. “With a Camera in Hand, I Was Alive.” NECSUS (June 7) in Audiovisual Essays, Spring 2023_#Ports. https://necsus-ejms.org/with-a-camera-in-hand-i-was-alive/
Grant, Catherine. 2014. “The Shudder of a Cinephiliac Idea? Videographic Film Studies Practice as Material Thinking.” Aniki 1(1): 49-62. https://doi.org/10.14591/aniki.v1n1.59
Grosz, Elizabeth. 1996. “Intolerable ambiguity: freaks as/at the limit.” In Freakery: cultural spectacles of the extraordinary body, edited by Rosemarie Garland Thomson, 55-66. New York: New York University Press.
Hall, Donald E. 2006. Queer Theories. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
hooks, bell. 1994. Teaching to Transgress. Education as the Practice of Freedom. New York: Routledge.
Kaes, Anton. 2009. Shell Shock Cinema: Weimar Culture and the Wounds of War. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400831197
Keathley, Christian. 2011 “La Caméra-Stylo: Notes on Video Criticism and Cinephilia.” In The Language and Style of Film Criticism, edited by Alex Clayton and Andrew Klevan, 176–91. London: Routledge.
Kreutzer, Evelyn, and Johannes Binotto. 2023. “A Manifesto for Videographic Vulnerability.” In Zeitschrift für Medienwissenschaft, ZfM Online, Videography (June 12, 2023). https://zfmedienwissenschaft.de/en/online/videography-blog/manifesto-videographic-vulnerability. https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-258342
Minas, Günter. 1989. “Zehn Thesen – Zur Wahrnehmungspsychologie des Experimentalfilms.” In Das Experimentalfilm-Handbuch, edited by Ingo Petzke, 245-259. Frankfurt: Deutsches Filmmuseum.
Mittell, Jason. 2024. The Chemistry of Character in Breaking Bad: A Videographic Book. Ann Arbor, MI: Lever Press. E-book. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.14330227
O’Leary, Alan. 2023. “Nebular Epistemics. Nebular Epistemics: A Glossary (Scholarship Like a Spider or Spit).” In Zeitschrift für Medienwissenschaft, ZfM Online, Videography (June 12, 2023). https://zfmedienwissenschaft.de/en/online/videography-blog/nebular-epistemics
Serres, Michel. 2008. The Five Senses. A Philosophy of Mingled Bodies. Transl. Margaret Sankey, Peter Cowley. London: Continuum.
Ben Spatz. 2015. What a Body Can Do. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315722344
Ben Spatz. 2020. Blue Sky Body. Thresholds for Embodied Research. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429466489
Dette værk er under følgende licens Creative Commons Navngivelse – Ikke-kommerciel – Ingen Bearbejdede Værker (by-nc-nd).
Copyright (c) 2024 Johannes Binotto