Keywords | Nøgleord
Citation/Eksport
Abstract | Abstract
Exploring aspects of the development of filmmaking research within the Academy over past decades, this article focuses on creative practice-based methods and the establishment of filmmaking as a legitimate research endeavour. It delves into the nuances of filmmaking research methodologies, specifically the rearticulation and repositioning of research practices to encompass both the work of filmmaking production and further filmmaking engagement with its reception. The importance of research statements in elucidating scholarly contributions made by films and other screen works, like scripts and video essays, is emphasised, alongside discussions of peer-review processes and the role of creative practice research journals in fostering critical dialogue within the filmmaking research community. Despite ongoing tensions between academic and industry requirements, the article argues for the progress of filmmaking research as a distinctive discipline with distinct methodologies, highlighting the need for continual refinement in quality assessment metrics to reflect the evolving nature of the field.
Referencer
Álvarez López, Christina, and Adrian Martin. 2014. “Introduction to the audiovisual essay: A child of two mothers.” NECSUS: European Journal of Media Studies. Autumn 2014. https://www.necsus-ejms.org/test/introduction-audiovisual-essay-child-two-mothers/
ASPERA, 2023a. “Sightlines Journal.” Australian Screen Production Education and Research Association. https://www.aspera.org.au/sightlines-journal
ASPERA, 2023b. “Call for works – Sightlines: Filmmaking in the Academy Journal Issue 6.” Australian Screen Production Education and Research Association. https://www.aspera.org.au/post/call-for-works-sightlines-filmmaking-in-the-academy-journal-issue-6
Batty, Craig, Marsha Berry, Kath Dooley, Bettina Frankham, Susan Kerrigan, and Margaret McVeigh. 2018. “Measuring excellence in screen production”. Australian Screen Production and Education Research Association. https://www.aspera.org.au/_files/ugd/cac777_0e422d2e335942f1984061fc235ce752.pdf
Batty, Craig, and Smiljana Glisovic. 2017. “Screen production research reporting: An ASPERA scoping report.” Australian Screen Production Education and Research Association. https://www.aspera.org.au/_files/ugd/cac777_51a14b0b5ddb49cda863d56c01b3726e.pdf
Batty, Craig, and Susan Kerrigan. 2018. “Screen production research: Creative practice as a mode of enquiry.” In Screen Production Research: Creative Practice as a Mode of Enquiry, edited by Craig Batty and Susan Kerrigan, 1-10. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62837-0_1.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1993. The Field of Cultural Production, edited by R. Johnson. New York: Columbia University Press.
Crofts, Charlotte, and Alexander Nevill. 2018. “Publishing screen media practice research: Evolving processes of contextualisation, peer review and future proofing in Screenworks.” Media Practice and Education 19 (3): 283-297. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741136.2018.1529478
Dawson, Andrew, and Sean Holmes. 2012. Working in the global film and television industries: Creativity, systems, space, patronage. Bloomsbury Academic.
Dovey, Jon. 2007. “Screen media practice research and peer review.” Journal of Media Practice 8 (1): 63-70. https://doi.org/10.1386/jmpr.8.1.63_3
FitzSimons, Trish. 2015. “‘I’ve got to STOP writing this (adjective of choice) article and get onto my filmmaking’: Documentary filmmaking as university research – some history and case studies.” Studies in Australasian Cinema 9 (2): 122-139. https://doi.org/10.1080/17503175.2015.1060009
Garwood, Ian. 2020. “Writing About the Scholarly Video Essay: Lessons from [in]Transition’s Creator Statements.” The Cine-Files 15 (2): Fall. https://www.thecine-files.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/IGarwood_TheCineFiles_issue15-2.pdf
Gibson, Ross. 2018. “Foreword: A cognitive two-steps.” In Screen Production Research: Creative Practice as a Mode of Enquiry, edited by Craig Batty and Susan Kerrigan, v-xiii. Palgrave Macmillan.
Glisovic, Smiljana, Leo Berkeley, and Craig Batty. 2016. “The problem of peer review in screen production: Exploring issues and proposing solutions.” Studies in Australasian Cinema 10 (1): 5-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/17503175.2015.1133262
Grant, Catherine. 2016. “The audiovisual essay as performative research.” Audiovisual Essays Autumn 2016. https://necsus-ejms.org/the-audiovisual-essay-as-performative-research/#_edn1
Haseman, Brad. 2006. “A manifesto for performative research.” Media International Australia incorporating Culture and Policy 118 (1): 98-106. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X0611800113
Kerrigan, Susan, Leo Berkeley, Sean Maher, Michael Sergi, and Alison Wotherspoon. 2015. “Screen production enquiry: A study of five Australian doctorates.” Studies in Australasian Cinema Journal 9 (2): 93-109. https://doi.org/10.1080/17503175.2015.1059990
Kerrigan, Susan, Gillian Leahy, and Hart Cohen. 2016. “Still a burning issue: Measuring screen production research.” Studies in Australasian Cinema 10 (1): 79-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/17503175.2016.1140257
Kerrigan, Susan, and Joanna Callaghan. 2018. “The impact of filmmaking research.” Journal of Media Practice and Education 19 (3): 229-242. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741136.2018.1472466
Kerrigan, Susan, and James Verdon. 2019. “Filmmaking Research Network: Surveying Films, Peers and Creative Practice” Refractory: a journal of entertainment media (ASPERA Special Issue) 33 (1): 1-23 http://hdl.handle.net/1959.3/451941
Kishore, Vikrant, Amit Sarwal, and Parichay Patra. 2014. Bollywood and its Other(s): Towards new configurations. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137426505
Kishore, Vikrant, and Ambrish Saxena. 2019. Indian cinema: Filmic content, social interface and new technologies. New Delhi: Kanishaka Publications.
Mateer, John. 2018. “A fistful of dollars or the sting? Considering academic–industry collaborations in the production of feature films.” Media Practice and Education 19 (2): 139-158. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741136.2018.1464715
Pearlman, Karen. 2016. Cutting rhythms: Intuitive Film Editing. Focal Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315719580
Smith, Hazel, and Roger Dean. 2009. Practice-led research and research-led practice in the creative arts. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748636303
Screenworks. 2023a. “Home.” screenworks.org. https://screenworks.org.uk/
Screenworks. 2023b “Volume 1 Editorial.” Screenworks 1. https://doi.org/10.37186/swrks/1.1
Sullivan, Graeme. 2005. Art practice as research: Inquiry in the visual arts. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications.
UoS. 2021. “University guidelines for Non-Traditional Research Outputs.” University of Sydney. https://www.sydney.edu.au/dam/intranet/documents/research-support/reporting/ntros/ntro-guidelines-sydney.pdf
Dette værk er under følgende licens Creative Commons Navngivelse – Ikke-kommerciel – Ingen Bearbejdede Værker (by-nc-nd).
Copyright (c) 2024 Susan Kerrigan, Bettina Frankham, James Verdon