Abstract
This case study examines how dialogic learning and teaching (DLT) can strengthen problem-based learning (PBL). Conducted in a fifth-semester communication course at Aalborg University, Denmark, the intervention explored whether the physical classroom can function as a meaningful dialogic space that enhances group work, collaboration, and student responsibility in alignment with PBL. Drawing on theoretical accounts of dialogue, particularly Wegerif’s framework, the study investigated class-level and group-level dialogue facilitated by the teacher rather than self-facilitated dialogue outsourced to isolated student groups. Empirical findings from surveys and classroom observations indicate that DLT fostered deeper engagement, strengthened mutual accountability, and improved students’ willingness to contribute, while also revealing tensions such as reduced opportunities for digital note-taking and the significant time required for high-quality dialogue. The study concludes that DLT can substantively enrich PBL by supporting shared problem exploration and collaborative meaning-making when adequate time and flexibility are provided.
References
Alexander, R. J. (2020). The dialogic teaching companion. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351040143
Askehave, I., Prehn, H. L., Pedersen, J., & Pedersen, M. T. (Eds.) (2015). PBL: Problem-Based Learning. Aalborg: Aalborg University Press.
Dawes, L., Mercer, N., & Wegerif, R. (2004). Thinking together: A programme of activities for developing speaking, listening and thinking skills for children aged 8–11 (2nd ed.). Imaginative Minds.
Dolmans, D. H. J. M., De Grave, W., Wolfhagen, I. H. A. P., & Van Der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2005). Problem-based learning: Future challenges for educational practice and research. Medical Education, 39(7), 732–741. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02205.x
Dysthe, O. (Ed.) (2003). Dialog, samspil og læring, Klim.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3
Høegh, T. (2018). Mundtlighed og fagdidaktik. Akademisk Forlag.
Innes, R. B. (2007). Dialogic communication in collaborative problem solving groups. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2007.010104
Jonassen, D. H., & Hung, W. (2012). Problem-based learning. In N. M. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning (pp. 2687–2690). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_210
Lipman, M. (2003). Thinking in education (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Newman, M. J. (2005). Problem based learning: An introduction and overview of the key features of the approach. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 32(1), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme.32.1.12
Savin-Baden, M. (2020). What are problem-based pedagogies? Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 7(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.24313/jpbl.2020.00199
Schmidt, H. G., Rotgans, J. I., & Yew, E. H. (2011). The process of problem-based learning: What works and why. Medical Education, 45(8), 792–806. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04035.x
van Diggelen, M. R., Doulougeri, K. I., Gomez-Puente, S. M., Bombaerts, G., Dirkx, K. J. H., & Kamp, R. J. A. (2021). Coaching in design-based learning: A grounded theory approach to create a theoretical model and practical propositions. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 31(2), 305–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-019-09549-x
Wegerif, R. (2006). Dialogic education: What is it and why do we need it? Education Review, 19(2), 58–66.
Wegerif, R. (2019). Dialogic education. In R. Wegerif (Ed.), Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.396

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Joachim Wiewiura