A system dynamics model for the development and decarbonization of district heating systems

Main Article Content

Madara Rieksta
https://orcid.org/0009-0005-3352-7583
Gatis Bazbauers
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6996-8472
Giovanni Brummana
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7081-1111
Edgars Vigants
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3408-5711

Abstract

This study evaluates the long-term impact of integrating an energy hub into a district heating system, with a particular focus on system autonomy, CO₂ emissions reduction, and cost dynamics up to 2050. A scenario-based approach was applied to assess three alternative development pathways, combining building renovation measures with different levels of heat supply decarbonization and energy resource diversification. The analysis considers changes in heat production structure, emissions balance, and economic performance under varying technological and market conditions.


The results indicate that by implementing the energy hub, the share of purchased heat energy decreases from approximately 70% in 2023 to 35% in 2050, while the share of self-produced heat energy increases from approximately 30% to 65%. The emission analysis shows that energy efficiency measures in the building sector alone provide limited mitigation potential, achieving only moderate CO₂ reductions. Substantially higher emission reductions, up to 36% by 2050, are achieved when building renovation is combined with a diversified and decarbonized heat supply, including the replacement of natural gas with low-carbon heat sources.


The economic assessment reveals a clear trade-off between cost efficiency and strategic energy independence. Scenarios with lower initial investments and increased reliance on wood-chip-based heat remain the most cost-effective option throughout the analysed period, while technologically advanced solutions with higher upfront costs, such as the integration of an energy hub with synthetic methane production, have higher annual costs despite additional revenues from electricity sales. Sensitivity analysis confirms that natural gas prices remain the dominant cost driver, although the implementation of the energy hub and synthetic methane production progressively reduces the systems vulnerability to gas price volatility.


The findings highlight the necessity of an integrated approach to district heating system transformation, demonstrating that long-term emission reductions, energy security, and economic resilience can only be achieved through the combined approach to building energy efficiency, heat supply decarbonization, and strategic long-term planning.

Article Details

How to Cite
Rieksta, M., Bazbauers, G., Brummana, G., & Vigants, E. (2026). A system dynamics model for the development and decarbonization of district heating systems. International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management, 50. https://doi.org/10.54337/ijsepm.11430
Section
Articles

References

[1] Malcher X, Tenorio-Rodriguez FC, Finkbeiner M, Gonzalez-Salazar M. Reducing the carbon footprint of district heating: Strategic approaches within the Avoid-shift-improve (ASI) framework. Energy Strategy Reviews 2025;62:101890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2025.101890.

[2] joint non-paper. The role of the heating and cooling sector in the EU 2040 climate and energy framework . Latvia, Austria, Cyprus, Denmark, Estonia, France, Ireland, Greece, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Portugal, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain: 2024.

[3] Galindo Fernández M, Gährs U, Aumaitre V, Roger-Lacan C. Efficient district heating and cooling systems in the EU. Luxembourg: 2016.

[4] Lepiksaar K, Kalme K, Siirde A, Volkova A. Heat Pump Use in Rural District Heating Networks in Estonia. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2021;25:786–802. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2021-0059.

[5] Simpson JG, Long N, Zhu G. Decarbonized district energy systems: Past review and future projections. Energy Conversion and Management: X 2024;24:100726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecmx.2024.100726.

[6] Malcher X, Tenorio-Rodriguez FC, Finkbeiner M, Gonzalez-Salazar M. Decarbonization of district heating: A systematic review of carbon footprint and key mitigation strategies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2025;215:115602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2025.115602.

[7] Garay-Martinez R, Meir M. Decarbonization of District Heating. Waste Heat Streams and Solar District Heating, 2022, p. 13–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10410-7_2.

[8] García-Céspedes J, Herms I, Arnó G, de Felipe JJ. Fifth-Generation District Heating and Cooling Networks Based on Shallow Geothermal Energy: A review and Possible Solutions for Mediterranean Europe. Energies (Basel) 2022;16:147. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16010147.

[9] Stock J, Schmidt T, Xhonneux A, Mueller D. Generation of Large District Heating System Models Using Open-Source Data and Tools: An Exemplary Workflow 2024. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2412.13950.

[10] Wack Y, Sollich M, Salenbien R, Diriken J, Baelmans M, Blommaert M. A multi-period topology and design optimization approach for district heating networks. Appl Energy 2024;367:123380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.123380.

[11] Sihvonen V, Ollila I, Jaanto J, Grönman A, Honkapuro S, Riikonen J, et al. Role of power-to-heat and thermal energy storage in decarbonization of district heating. Energy 2024;305:132372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2024.132372.

[12] Hiltunen P, Lindroos TJ, Rämä M. Electrification of district heating: The impact of electricity price volatility and distribution temperatures on the optimal capacity mix. Energy Conversion and Management: X 2026;29:101449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecmx.2025.101449.

[13] Auvinen K, Lindroos TJ, Hedman Å, Savolainen H, Lumijärvi A, Tainio P. Transition pathway for the city toward low-emission district heating system with heat auctions promoting third-party network access. Oxford Open Energy 2024;3. https://doi.org/10.1093/ooenergy/oiae018.

[14] Auvinen K, Meriläinen T, Saikku L, Hyysalo S, Juntunen JK. Accelerating transition toward district heating-system decarbonization by policy co-design with key investors: opportunities and challenges. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy 2023;19. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2023.2256622.

[15] Lund R. Energy System Benefits of Combined Electricity and Thermal Storage Integrated with District Heating. International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management 2021;31:23–38. https://doi.org/10.5278/ijsepm.6273.

[16] Meschede H, Hesselbach J, Child M, Breye C. On the impact of probabilistic weather data on the economically optimal design of renewable energy systems – a case study of La Gomera island. International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management 2019;23:15–26. https://doi.org/10.5278/ijsepm.3142.

[17] Knies J. A spatial approach for future-oriented heat planning in urban areas. International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management 2018;16:3–30. https://doi.org/10.5278/ijsepm.2018.16.2.

[18] Möller B, Nielsen S. High resolution heat atlases for demand and supply mapping. International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management 2014;1:41–58. https://doi.org/10.5278/ijsepm.2014.1.4.

[19] Borelli G, Ricciuti S, Mahbub MS, Sartori A, Gasparella A, Pernigotto G, et al. Simulation of energy scenarios for the transition of an urban neighborhood into a renewable energy community. International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management 2024;42:28–47. https://doi.org/10.54337/ijsepm.8235.

[20] Edtmayer H, Fochler L-M, Mach T, Fauster J, Schwab E, Hochenauer C. High-resolution, spatial thermal energy demand analysis and workflow for a city district. International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management 2023;38:47–64. https://doi.org/10.54337/ijsepm.7570.

[21] Østergaard PA, Cabrera P, Johannsen RM. Sustainable energy planning with storage, photo voltaics, biomass co-firing forecasting and heat planning. International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management 2025;47:1–6. https://doi.org/10.54337/ijsepm.11164.

[22] Østergaard PA, Johannsen RM, Duic N, Lund H, Mathiesen BV, Soares MIRT, et al. Sustainable Energy Planning and Management Vol 38. International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management 2023;38:1–7. https://doi.org/10.54337/ijsepm.7812.

[23] Lund H, Thellufsen JZ, Østergaard PA, Sorknæs P, Skov IR, Mathiesen BV. EnergyPLAN – Advanced analysis of smart energy systems. Smart Energy 2021;1:100007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.segy.2021.100007.

[24] Seixas J, Østergaard PA, Johannsen RM, Duic N. Energy Transition and Sustainability. International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management 2021;32:1–4. https://doi.org/10.5278/ijsepm.6850.

[25] Østergaard PA. Sustainable Energy Planning and Management with PV, Waste heat, positive energy districts and CO2 accounting. International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management 2024;41:1–4. https://doi.org/10.54337/ijsepm.8513.

[26] Farshidian B, Rajabi-Ghahnavieh A, Haghi E. Planning of multi-hub energy system by considering competition issue. International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management 2021;30:5–20. https://doi.org/10.5278/ijsepm.6190.

[27] Abbasi Godarzi A, Abdi Rokni K. Estimating the influential impact share of reducing household energy consumption across different sectors aimed at increasing cumulative profits in Iran: A non-linear programming optimization approach. International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management 2025;43:52–69. https://doi.org/10.54337/ijsepm.8672.

[28] Petersen M, Andreae E, Skov IR, Dahl Nielsen F, You S, Cronin A, et al. Vision of Offshore Energy Hub at Faroe Islands: The Market Equilibrium Impact. International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management 2024;40:115–30. https://doi.org/10.54337/ijsepm.8057.

[29] Wann A, Connolly D, Gallachoir BO. Investigating 100% renewable energy supply at regional level using scenario analysis. International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management 2014;3:21–32. https://doi.org/10.5278/ijsepm.2014.3.3.

[30] Szép T, Pálvölgyi T, Kármán-Tamus É. “Landscape” of energy burden: role of solid fuels in Central and Eastern European residential heating. International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management 2023;37:61–74. https://doi.org/10.54337/ijsepm.7503.

[31] Kaiser A, Cadenbach AM, Krebs F. Stakeholder-informed multi-criteria decision-making for sustainable heat supply. International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management 2025;47:104–18. https://doi.org/10.54337/ijsepm.9698.

[32] Szép T, Pálvölgyi T, Kármán-Tamus É. Indicator-based assessment of sustainable energy performance in the European Union. International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management 2022;34:107–24. https://doi.org/10.54337/ijsepm.7055.

[33] Østergaard PA, Duic N. Sustainable Energy Planning and Management with focus on local energy system transition, spatial carbon factors, community ownership, trust, and household energy management. International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management 2025;46:1–3. https://doi.org/10.54337/ijsepm.10682.

[34] Østergaard PA, Lund H, Johannsen RM, Sperling K, Duic N. Ten years of sustainable energy planning and management. International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management 2024;40:1–7. https://doi.org/10.54337/ijsepm.8360.

[35] Tian Z, Gao Y, Wu J, Tang Y, Liu G, Yun J. Quantitative Analysis and Carbon Reduction Strategies Based on Spatiotemporal Electricity Carbon Emission Factors. International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management 2025;46:41–57. https://doi.org/10.54337/ijsepm.9789.

[36] Groissböck M. Energy hub optimization framework based on open-source software & data - review of frameworks and a concept for districts & industrial parks. International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management 2021;31:109–20. https://doi.org/10.5278/ijsepm.6243.

[37] Roberto R, De Iulio R, Di Somma M, Graditi G, Guidi G, Noussan M. A multi-objective optimization analysis to assess the potential economic and environmental benefits of distributed storage in district heating networks: a case study. International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management 2019;20:5–20. https://doi.org/10.5278/ijsepm.2019.20.2.

[38] Ziemele J, Gravelsins A, Blumberga A, Vigants G, Blumberga D. System dynamics model analysis of pathway to 4th generation district heating in Latvia. Energy 2016;110:85–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.11.073.

[39] Ziemele J, Gravelsins A, Blumberga A, Blumberga D. Combining energy efficiency at source and at consumer to reach 4th generation district heating: Economic and system dynamics analysis. Energy 2017;137:595–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.04.123.

[40] Volkova A, Mašatin V, Siirde A. Methodology for evaluating the transition process dynamics towards 4th generation district heating networks. Energy 2018;150:253–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.02.123.

[41] Kalina J, Tańczuk M, Jendryasek Ł. Planning energy transition and decarbonisation of district heating systems in Poland. Energy 2025;328:136578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2025.136578.

[42] Naugle A, Langarudi S, Clancy T. What is (quantitative) system dynamics modeling? Defining characteristics and the opportunities they create. Syst Dyn Rev 2024;40. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.1762.

[43] Rieksta M, Brumana G, Vigants E, Bazbauers G. Heat Demand in Non-Residential Buildings: Renovation and Subsidy Effects. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2026;30:65–77. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2026-0005.

[44] Rieksta M, Zarins E, Brumana G, Bazbauers G. Forecasting Heat Demand of Residential Buildings Connected to District Heating: The Case of Riga. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2025;29:68–83. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2025-0005.

[45] Mazzeo D, Matera N, Cornaro C, Oliveti G, Romagnoni P, De Santoli L. EnergyPlus, IDA ICE and TRNSYS predictive simulation accuracy for building thermal behaviour evaluation by using an experimental campaign in solar test boxes with and without a PCM module. Energy Build 2020;212:109812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.109812.

[46] Brumana G, Bazbauers G, Franchini G, Ghirardi E, Rieksta M, Vigants E. Design and Optimization of a Fully Renewable-Based Energy Mix. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2025;29:1005–18. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2025-0067.

[47] Brumana G, Rieksta M, Bazbauers G, Franchini G, Ghirardi E, Vigants E. Decarbonisation strategy for district heating based on an existing gas-turbine combined heat and power plant: A novel approach with long-term scenario techno-economic optimisation. Energy Convers Manag 2026;356:121328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2026.121328.

[48] Rīgas Siltums. Confidential company data. Riga: n.d.

[49] Duić N, Štefanić N, Krajačić G, Pukšec T, Novosel T. Heat Roadmap Europe: a low-carbon heating and cooling strategy. Croatia: 2017.

[50] Ea Energy Analyses. Analysis of biomass prices: future Danish prices for straw, wood chips and wood pellets. Copenhagen: 2013.

[51] IRENA. Green Hydrogen Cost Reduction: Scaling up Electrolysers to Meet the 1.50C Climate Goal. Abu Dhabi: 2020.

[52] Crespi E, Colbertaldo P, Guandalini G, Campanari S. Design of hybrid power-to-power systems for continuous clean PV-based energy supply. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2021;46:13691–708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.09.152.

[53] Turchi C, Boyd M, Kesseli D, Kurup P, Mehos M, Neises T. CSP Systems Analysis - Final Project Report. 2019.

[54] Energy Transitions Commission. Making the Hydrogen Economy Possible: Accelerating Clean Hydrogen in an Electrified Economy. London: 2023.