Abstract | Abstract
Against Illustration advocates for a methodology of purposeful difficulty in video essaying, in search of new critical entrances into their objects of study. The field of videographic criticism encompasses a broad variety of formal approaches that often differ in their invocation of root objects. Where the dominant ideology of cinema has been perpetuated through common systems of visual codes, and tends to invite an evidentiary approach, videographic criticism has often sought, as a symptom and practice of empowered, post-modern cinephilia, to develop subjective and intimate transformations of objects. In this they enrich, celebrate, and just as often, trouble the themes, iconographies and histories of cinema. Against Illustration suggests for a reconciliation between the purposeful difficulty of experimental cinema and the promise of such an approach in videographic essaying. To do so, the author explores George Steiner’s typology of difficulty in poetry (and in particular its tactical and ontological manifestations), Steiner’s suggestions for creative reading/spectatorship, and his pursuit of a critical entrance into an art steeled against easy perception and ready interpretation.
Referencer
Bellour, Raymond. 1975. “The Unattainable Text.” Screen 16 (3) (October): 19-28. https://doi.org/10.1093/screen/16.3.19
Broomer, Stephen. 2017. Codes for North: Foundations of the Canadian Experimental Film. Toronto: Canadian Filmmakers Distribution Centre.
Ferguson, Kevin L. 2016. “The Slices of Cinema: Surrealism as Research Strategy.” In The Arclight Guidebook to Media History and the Digital Humanities, edited by Charles R. Acland and Eric Hoyt, 270-299. REFRAME Books.
Grant, Catherine. 2019. “Beast Fables: A Videographic Study of Cinematic Deer and Transhuman Children.” The Cine-Files 14 (spring). https://www.thecine-files.com/cgrant/
Grant, Catherine. 2015. Carnal Locomotive. Video, 05:00. https://vimeo.com/119051190
Grant, Catherine. 2023. “Falling: 3 x Girls in Uniform: The Video Essay as Curatorial Practice.” Feminist Media Histories 9 (4): 44-52. https://doi.org/10.1525/fmh.2023.9.4.44
Grant, Catherine. 2018. Fated to Be Mated: An Architectural Promenade. Video, 04:35. https://vimeo.com/300303270
Grant, Catherine. 2019. Liquid Perception. Video, 01:56. https://vimeo.com/368643548
Grant, Catherine. 2018. Magic Mirror Maze. Video, 05:01. https://vimeo.com/277397613
Jacobs, Ken. 1969. Tom, Tom, the Piper’s Son. Video, 1:55:50. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=69PNirfMYlM
Keathley, Christian. 2011. “La Caméra-stylo: Notes on Video Criticism and Cinephilia.” In The Language and Style of Film Criticism, edited by Andrew Klevan and Alex Clayton, 176-191. London: Routledge.
O’Leary, Alan. 2021. “Workshop of Potential Scholarship: Manifesto for a parametric videographic criticism.” NECSUS_European Journal of Media Studies 10 (1) (Spring): 75-98.
Razutis, Al. 1979. Lumière’s Train (Arriving at the Station).
Steiner, George. 1978. On Difficulty, and other essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Testa, Bart. 1992. Back and Forth: Early Cinema and the Avant-Garde. Waterloo, Ont.: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.
Dette værk er under følgende licens Creative Commons Navngivelse – Ikke-kommerciel – Ingen Bearbejdede Værker (by-nc-nd).
Copyright (c) 2024 Stephen Broomer