Keywords | Nøgleord
Citation/Eksport
Abstract | Abstract
In this article, we take up some of the suggestions presented in the call for papers emphasizing the connections between the concepts of new management and transdisciplinarity.
Since the aim of the special issue is to explore experiences and studies related to the development of managerial thought, the innovation in managerial activities, and the overcoming of neoliberal managerial mainstreaming approaches, we solicited contributions connected to ways that management may support the overcomingof critical situations, facing the evolution required to reconfigure existing working, professional, and organizational cultures, and how it may be able to deal with an incoming challenging, paradoxical, and contradictory scenario.
Referencer
Allen, Stephen, Ann L. Cunliffe, and Mark Easterby-Smith. 2019. “Understanding Sustainability Through the Lens of Egocentric Radical-Reflexivity: Implications for Management Education.” Journal of Business Ethics 154: 781-795. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3420-3
Alvesson, Mats, and Jörgen Sandberg. 2014. “Habitat and Habitus: Boxed-in versus Box-Breaking Research.” Organization Studies 35 (7): 967-987. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840614530916
Alvesson, Mats, Todd Bridgman, and Hugh Willmott. 2009. “Introduction.” In The Oxford Handbook of Critical Management Studies, edited by Mats Alvesson, Todd Bridgman and Hugh Willmott, 1-26. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Alvesson, Mats, Cynthia Hardy, and Bill Harley. 2008. “Reflecting on Reflexivity: Reflexive Textual Practices in Organization and Management Theory.” Journal of Management Studies 45 (3): 480-501. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00765.x
Battilana, Julie, and Tiziana Casciaro. 2012. “Change Agents, Networks, and Institutions: A Contingency Theory of Organizational Change.” Academy of Management Journal 55 (2): 381-398. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.0891
Bennett, Nathan, and G. James Lemoine. 2014. “What a difference a word makes: Understanding threats to performance in a VUCA world.” Business Horizons 57 (3): 311–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2014.01.001
Blomgren, Maria, and Caroline Waks 2015. “Coping with contradictions: hybrid professionals managing institutional complexity.” Journal of Professions and Organization 2 (1): 78-102. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/jou010
Bondarouk, Tanya, and Chris Brewster. 2016. “Conceptualizing the future of HRM and technology research.” The International Journal of Human Resource Management 27 (21): 2652-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2016.1232296
Brush, Candida, Anne de Bruin, and Friederike Welter. 2009. “A gender-aware framework for women’s entrepreneurship.” International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship 1(1): 8–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/17566260910942318
Butera, Federico. 2017. ”Lavoro e organizzazione nella quarta rivoluzione industriale: la nuova progettazione socio-tecnica [Work and organization in the fourth industrial revolution: the new socio-technical design].” L’industria 38 (3): 291-316.
Carroll, Noel, and Kieran Conboy. 2020. “Normalizing the “new normal”: Changing tech-driven work practices under pandemic time pressure.” International Journal of Information Management 55: 102186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102186
Cassell, Catherine, and Gillian Symon. 1994. Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research. Sage.
Cunliffe, Ann L., Ana Carolina Aguiar, Vincente Góes, and Fernanda Carreira. 2020. “Radical-reflexivity and transdisciplinarity as paths to developing responsible management education.” In The SAGE Handbook of Responsible Management Learning and Education, edited by Dirk C. Moosmayer, Oliver Laasch, Carole Parkes, and Kenneth G. Brown, 298-314. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526477187.n19
Czarniawska, Barbara. 2008. “Organizing: how to study it and how to write about it.” Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal 3 (1): 4-20. https://doi.org/10.1108/17465640810870364
Denis, Jean-Louis, Lise Lamothe, and Ann Langley. 2001. “The Dynamics of Collective Leadership and Strategic Change in Pluralistic Organizations.” The Academy of Management Journal 44 (4): 809–837. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069417
Dieleman, Hans. 2017. “Transdisciplinary hermeneutics: A symbiosis of science, art, philosophy, reflective practice, and subjective experience.” Issues in Interdisciplinary Studies 35: 170-199.
Engeström, Yrjö. 2008. From Teams to Knots: Activity-Theoretical Studies of Collaboration and Learning at Work. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619847
Engeström, Yrjö. 2015. Learning by Expanding: An Activity-Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139814744
Engeström, Yrjö. 2020. “Concept formation in the wild: towards a research agenda.” Éducation & Didactique 14 (2): 99-113. https://doi.org/10.4000/educationdidactique.6816
Engeström, Yrjö, and Annalisa Sannino. 2021. “From mediated actions to heterogenous coalitions: four generations of activity-theoretical studies of work and learning.” Mind, Culture, and Activity 28 (1): 4-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2020.1806328
Feldman, Martha S., and Wanda J. Orlikowski. 2011. “Theorizing Practice and Practicing Theory.” Organization Science 22 (5): 1240-1253. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0612
Frey, Carl B., and Michael A. Osborne 2017. “The future of employment: how susceptible are jobs to computerization?” Technological forecasting and social change 114 (1): 254-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019
Gümüsay, Ali A., Michael Smets, and Timothy Morris. 2020. “‘God at Work’: Engaging Central and Incompatible Institutional Logics through Elastic Hybridity.” Academy of Management Journal 63 (1): 124-154. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.0481
Harris, Rob. 2016. “New organizations and new workspaces: Implications for workplace design and management.” Journal of Corporate Real Estate 18 (1): 4-16. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCRE-10-2015-0026
Hecklaua, Fabian, Mila Galeitzke, Sebastian Flachs, and Holger Kohl. 2016. “Holistic Approach for Human Resource Management in Industry 4.0.” Procedia CIRP 54: 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.05.102
Janssens, Maddy, and Chris Steyaert. 2009. “HRM and Performance: A Plea for Reflexivity in HRM Studies.” Journal of Management Studies 46 (1): 143–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00812.x
Klein, Julie T. 2008. “Evaluation of Interdisciplinary and Transdisciplinary Research: A Literature Review.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine 35 (2 Suppl): S116–S123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.010
Law, John. 2002. Aircraft Stories: Decentering the Object in Technoscience. Durham: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822383543
Maitlis, Sally, and Marlys Christianson. 2014. “Sensemaking in Organizations: Taking Stock and Moving Forward.” Academy of Management Annals 8 (1): 57-125. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2014.873177
Makridakis, Spyros. 2017. “The forthcoming Artificial Intelligence (AI) revolution: Its impact on society and firms.” Futures 90: 46-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2017.03.006
McGivern, Gerry, Graeme Currie, Ewan Ferlie, Louise Fitzgerald, and Justin Waring. 2015. “Hybrid manager-professionals’ identity work: the maintenance and hybridization of medical professionalism in managerial contexts.” Public Administration 93 (2): 412-432. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12119
Mintzberg, Henry. 1985. “The organization as political arena.” Journal of Management Studies 22 (2): 133-154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1985.tb00069.x
Mintzberg, Henry. 2009. Managing. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Nicolescu, Basarab. 2010. “Methodology of Transdisciplinarity – Levels of Reality, Logic of the Included Middle and Complexity.” Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering & Science 1 (1): 19-38. https://doi.org/10.22545/2010/0009
Nicolescu, Basarab. 2012. “Transdisciplinarity: The hidden third, between the subject and the object.” Human & Social Studies 1 (1): 13-28.
Noordegraaf, Mirko. 2015. “Hybrid professionalism and beyond: (New) Forms of public professionalism in changing organizational and societal contexts.” Journal of Professions and Organization 2 (2): 187-206. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/jov002
Peters, Michael A. 2017. “Technological unemployment: Educating for the fourth industrial revolution.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 49 (1): 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2016.1177412
Scaratti, Giuseppe, and Silvia Ivaldi. 2021. “Uniqueness and Generalization in Organizational Psychology: Research as a Relational Practice.” Frontiers in Psychology 12: 638240. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.638240
Scaratti, Giuseppe, Ezio Fregnan, and Silvia Ivaldi. 2021. “The Training Setting as a Social and Liminal Space for Professional Hybridization.” Frontiers in Psychology 12: 804008. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.804008
Singer, Merill, and Scott Clair. 2003. “Syndemics and Public Health: Reconceptualizing Disease in Bio-Social Context.” Medical Anthropology Quarterly 17 (4): 423-441. https://doi.org/10.1525/maq.2003.17.4.423
Stiegler, Bernard. 2014. Digital studies: Organologie des savoirs et technologies de la connaissance [Digital studies: Organology of knowledge technologies]. Limoges: FYP Éditions.
Taptiklis, Theodore. 2005. “After managerialism.” Emergence: Complexity and Organization 7: 2-14.
Tsoukas, Haridimos. 2009. “Craving for Generality and Small-N Studies: A Wittgensteinian Approach towards the Epistemology of the Particular in Organization and Management Studies.” In The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Research Methods, edited by David Buchanan and Alan Bryman, 285–301. London: Sage.
Whitley, Richard. 1984. “The scientific status of management research as a practically oriented social science.” Journal of Management Studies 21 (4): 369-390. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1984.tb00234.x
Dette værk er under følgende licens Creative Commons Navngivelse – Ikke-kommerciel – Ingen Bearbejdede Værker (by-nc-nd).
Copyright (c) 2024 Giuseppe Scaratti, Silvia Ivaldi, Søren Frimann