Keywords
ChatGPT
Problem-based Learning
Students
Design experiment
Exploration
How to Cite
Abstract
This article presents a design experiment in which generative artificial intelligence (GAI) was topically integrated into a Problem-based Learning module in a pedagogical study programme with the intention to generate insights for both, future GAI-in-PBL practice and theory. Based on various data (student reports, notes, a focus group interview, transcripts of teachers/researchers’ discussions), three design elements were assessed regarding their potential to help students to develop their own learning practices with GAI, and regarding how the emergent practices and dynamics enrich existing PBL theory. The analysis revealed students’ weariness, shame and fear for/of using GAI, but also how the PBL process enabled them to develop their own reflective and nuanced GAI practices built on their own learning, integrating community, communication and trust. The experiment also revealed co-knowledge construction amongst students, while stakeholders and teachers were seen as figures of authority on how to approach GAI.
References
Aalborg University. (2015). PBL. Problem-based Learning. https://prod-aaudxp-cms-001-app.azurewebsites.net/media/mmmjbthi/pbl-aalborg-model_uk.pdf
Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-Based Research: A Decade of Progress in Education Research? Educational Researcher, 41(1), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X11428813
Atlas, S. (2023). ChatGPT for Higher Education and Professional Development: A Guide to Conversational AI. https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/cba_facpubs/548
Barab, S., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-Based Research: Putting a Stake in the Ground. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1301_1
Bell, P. (2004). On the Theoretical Breadth of Design-Based Research in Education. Educational Psychologist, 39(4), 243–253. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3904_6
Brown, A. L. (1992). Design Experiments: Theoretical and Methodological Challenges in Creating Complex Interventions in Classroom Settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141–178. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0202_2
Cambridge, D., Wenger-Trayner, E., Hammer, P., Reid, P., & Wilson, L. (2024). Theoretical and Practical Principles for Generative AI in Communities of Practice and Social Learning. In A. Buch, Y. Lindberg, & T. Cerratto Pargman (Eds.), Framing Futures in Postdigital Education (pp. 229–239). Springer Nature Switzerland.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-58622-4_13
Campanella, M., & Penuel, W. R. (2021). Design‑Based Research in Educational Settings. Motivations, Crosscutting Features, and Considerations for Design. In Z. A. Philippakos, E. Howell, & A. Pellegrino (Eds.), Design-based research in education: Theory and applications. The Guilford Press.
Carvalho, L., Martinez-Maldonado, R., Tsai, Y.-S., Markauskaite, L., & De Laat, M. (2022). How can we design for learning in an AI world? Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100053
Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8
Chan, N. N., Walker, C., & Gleaves, A. (2015). An exploration of students’ lived experiences of using smartphones in diverse learning contexts using a hermeneutic phenomenological approach. Computers & Education, 82, 96–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.11.001
Collins, A. (1992). Toward a Design Science of Education. In E. Scanlon & T. O’Shea (Eds.), New Directions in Educational Technology (pp. 15–22). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77750-9_2
Corbin, T., Dawson, P., Nicola-Richmond, K., & Partridge, H. (2025). ‘Where’s the line? It’s an absurd line’: towards a framework for acceptable uses of AI in assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2025.2456207
Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: The state of the field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8
Dai, Y., Liu, A., & Lim, C. P. (2023). Reconceptualizing ChatGPT and generative AI as a student-driven innovation in higher education. Procedia CIRP, 119, 84–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2023.05.002
Davidsen, J., Andersen, P. V. K., & Christiansen, E. (2019). Problem-based Learning in a Box: Lessons learned from an Educational Design Experiment. Journal of Problem Based Learning in Higher Education, 7(1), 120-132. https://doi.org/10.5278/ojs.jpblhe.v7i1.2375
Dede, C. (2025). Why Design-Based Research Is Both Important and Difficult. Educational Technology & Society, 45(1), 5–8.
Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-Based Research: An Emerging Paradigm for Educational Inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5–8. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032001005
Duek, J. L. E. (2000). Whose Group Is It, Anyway? Equity of Student Discourse in Problem-Based Learning (PBL). In D. H. Evensen & C. E. Hmelo-Silver (Eds.), Problem-based Learning. A Research Perspective on Learning Interactions (pp. 75–107). Routledge.
Feng, C., Bae, H., Glazewski, K., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Brush, T. A., Mott, B. W., Lee, S. Y., & Lester, J. C. (2024). Exploring facilitation strategies to support socially shared regulation in a problem-based learning game. Educational Technology & Society, 27(3), 318–334.
Gadamer, H.-G. (2006). Truth and method (J. Weinsheimer & D. G. Marhsall, Trans.; 2., rev. ed., reprint). Continuum.
Glegg, S. M. N. (2019). Facilitating Interviews in Qualitative Research With Visual Tools: A Typology. Qualitative Health Research, 29(2), 301–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732318786485
Gorard, S., Roberts, K., & Taylor, C. (2004). What kind of creature is a design experiment? British Educational Research Journal, 30(4), 577–590. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192042000237248
Hanghøj, T., Händel, V. D., Duedahl, T. V., & Gundersen, P. B. (2022). Exploring the Messiness of Design Principles in Design-Based Research. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 17(4), 222–233. https://doi.org/10.18261/njdl.17.4.3
Hare, S. (2022). Technology is not neutral. A short guide to technology ethics. London Publishing Partnership.
Hoadley, C., & Campos, F. C. (2022). Design-based research: What it is and why it matters to studying online learning. Educational Psychologist, 57(3), 207–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2022.2079128
Højberg, H. (2014). Hermeneutik. In L. Fuglsang, P. B. Olsen, & K. Rasborg (Eds.), Videnskabsteori i samfundsvidenskaberne. På tværs af fagkulturer og paradigmer (2nd ed., pp. 289–323). Samfundslitteratur.
Holgaard, J. E., Guerra, A., Kolmos, A., & Petersen, L. S. (2017). Getting a hold on the problem in a problem-based learning environment. International Journal of Engineering Education, 33, 1070–1085.
Holgaard, J. E., Ryberg, T., Stegeager, N., Stentoft, D., & Thomassen, A. O. (2021). An Introduction to Problem-Based Learning in Higher Education. Samfundslitteratur.
Hung, W., Moallem, M., & Dabbagh, N. (2019). Social Foundations of Problem-Based Learning. In The Wiley Handbook of Problem-Based Learning (pp. 51–79). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119173243.ch3
Lee, L., Lajoie, S. P., Poitras, E. G., Nkangu, M., & Doleck, T. (2017). Co-regulation and knowledge construction in an online synchronous problem based learning setting. Education and Information Technologies, 22(4), 1623–1650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9509-6
Lolle, E. L., Scholkmann, A., & Kristensen, N. S. (2023). Reflections. What are they and how to work with them? In A. Kolmos & T. Ryberg (Eds.), PBL in a Digital Age (1st ed., Vol. 3, pp. 89–102). Aalborg University Press.
Milner, A. L., & Scholkmann, A. (2023). Future teachers for future societies: Transforming teacher professionalism through problem-based professional learning and development. Professional Development in Education, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2023.2203173
O’Brien, R., McGarr, O., & Lynch, R. (2022). Students’ perceptions of lecturer power and authority in a higher education PBL business programme. Teaching in Higher Education, 27(5), 615–631. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1725881
Pekrun, R. (2019). Inquiry on emotions in higher education: Progress and open problems. Studies in Higher Education, 44(10), 1806–1811. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1665335
Quinlan, K. M. (2016). How Emotion Matters in Four Key Relationships in Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. College Teaching, 64(3), 101–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2015.1088818
Reimann, P. (2011). Design-Based Research. In L. Markauskaite, P. Freebody, & J. Irwin (Eds.), Methodological Choice and Design (pp. 37–50). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8933-5_3
Romele, A., Severo, M., & Furia, P. (2020). Digital hermeneutics: From interpreting with machines to interpretational machines. AI & SOCIETY, 35(1), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-018-0856-2
Scholkmann, A. (2017). “What I learn is what I like.” How do students in ICT-supported problem-based learning rate the quality of the learning experience, and how does it relate to the acquisition of competences? Education and Information Technologies, 22(6), 2857–2870. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9629-7
Silin, Y., & Kwok, D. (2016). A study of students’ attitudes towards using ICT in a social constructivist environment. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2890
Sørensen, M. T. (2018). The Students’ Choice of Technology A pragmatic and outcome-focused Approach. In D. Kergel, B. Heidkamp, P. K. Telléus, T. Rachwal, & S. Nowakowski (Eds.), The Digital Turn in Higher Education (pp. 161–174). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-19925-8_12
Thomassen, A. O., & Stentoft, D. (2020). Educating Students for a Complex Future: Why Integrating a Problem Analysis in Problem-Based Learning Has Something to Offer. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.14434/ijpbl.v14i2.28804
Yu, H. (2023). Reflection on whether Chat GPT should be banned by academia from the perspective of education and teaching. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1181712. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1181712
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Antonia Scholkmann, Maja Højslet Schurer, Cecilie Hviid